Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:37
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Mosquitoes are here early. How to keep the world’s deadliest animal out of your backyard. - NJ.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump calls Iran’s retaliatory strike ‘very weak,’ says country gave ‘early notice’ of attack - PBS
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What's it like to have an IQ of 140 to 170? Do people notice you're different?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
New Report Details Knicks’ Jalen Brunson Concern Before Firing Tom Thibodeau - Sports Illustrated
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?